Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas Judge Abbe Fletman has denied Petitioners' appeal "In The Matter of Presidential Election of 2016", "opinion of court to follow", according to Philadelphia Deputy City Commisioner, Fred Voight.
I can't seem to find the docket number, so I haven't actually seen papers. Will add more as it comes in.
[UPDATE: Via CBS PHILLY - "After hearing oral arguments, Philadelphia Common Pleas Court Judge Abbe Fletman denied the appeal. She affirmed the city commissioner’s decision to reject the request by Jill Stein’s lawyers for a forensic audit, to look into the software of voting machines.
After Stein’s supporters filed affadavits for the recount, elections officials checked out 75 of 1,686 city voting divisions. While a deputy city solicitor told the judge 'there was no evidence of any discrepancies...' "
[UPDATE: Via CBS PHILLY - "After hearing oral arguments, Philadelphia Common Pleas Court Judge Abbe Fletman denied the appeal. She affirmed the city commissioner’s decision to reject the request by Jill Stein’s lawyers for a forensic audit, to look into the software of voting machines.
After Stein’s supporters filed affadavits for the recount, elections officials checked out 75 of 1,686 city voting divisions. While a deputy city solicitor told the judge 'there was no evidence of any discrepancies...' "
Who was the petitioner? Sorry if the question sounds ignorant, but I'm getting confused with all the different hearings.
ReplyDeleteDont have the names or papers, see update. "In The Matter of Presidential Election of 2016"
DeleteThis concerns the suit for Stein wanting to do forensics on the voting machines I think.
ReplyDeleteIt does.
ReplyDeleteMI court news Goldsmith writing an opinion later. Jillary played Russian Cyber attack on machines card very hard. See https://twitter.com/RobertSnellnews?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw live twittering of the whole case.
ReplyDeleteThanks for posting that link chatty comma the Russians are coming the Russians are coming. Did they have any evidence besides news reports of agencies doing this and that that they support any expert testimony with sworn affidavits. This whole recount thing is making a mockery of 200 years of civil procedure. You can't just go into court and go the Russians are coming the Russians are coming you have to have evidence you have to have a witness you have to swear them in. This is insanity
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI swear that's one of the funniest fakest videos I've ever seen.
DeleteSince they can't tamper with the voting machines now, what harm is there in letting them do a statewide recount?
ReplyDeleteTrump supporters think Democrats are corrupt and will lie, cheat and steal to get their way. Trump was lucking to win with all the cheating that went on from the left. A recount would be just an opportunity for the left to complete the scam.
DeleteSo far the recounts themselves have yielded nothing for Shill Stein's side, and even exposed fraud in Milwaukee in Hillary's votes. How can Stein still exploit this to their benefit if she has no access to do any tampering?
DeleteTo Unknown. /opinion
DeleteA: Stein is not aggrieved by the results.
B: MI already ran a recount due to law.
C: Stein is usurping State Courts (Fed) with hearsay non evidence. A State has a choice to choose how to choose its electors.
That said:
Now, if Hillary's Camp would have been the complaintaint, she may qualify to front this, and this might have a bit more merit in Michigan. (Not in PA for sure.) As State Law in MI shown last night, she had no case for this, and it never should have been interfered with in Federal. This is a bad precedent to set, when STEIN has no evidence, could not win, has no chance, and is applying burden to not only the State, but to anyone having to deal with it. It isn't just about tax dollars either, as this can have irreparable harm on others.evidence.
TRO just dissolved. It's over. Well, that was an interesting week.
DeleteCan you send the link? I don't see ON the Detroit press
DeleteNever mind just found it
DeleteMI FED judge judges for TRUMP. And Michigan has certified their vote. https://twitter.com/RobertSnellnews MI votes go to Trump.
DeleteLook in 9th paragraph to see where MI has already certified results: http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2016/12/05/recount-unrecountable/95007392/
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIn my capacity as acting sherpa for Truth, I was on a phone with Philly Deputy Commisioner, Fred Voight, today asking him to send me the actual petitions for recount and the appeal briefs that Judge Fletman was considering, when - wait for it - her decision denying the appeal hit his screen simultaneously. I think it freaked him out. I was literally spelling my name for him - R E N - when he was like, "Oh. Here it is now. It just hit my screen. The appeal has been denied. Opinion will follow."
ReplyDeleteSychronicity follows the sherpa.
He took my email to get back to me re the papers I was looking for. And I wanted to grill him on his quote below from a PennLive.com report on Dec 2d re computation date - but I knew I had a real scoop on the appeal, rushed off phone and broke that story a good 40 minutes ahead of CBS Philly. Bummed I didn't get to the computation issue. I think someone above from the cabal gave him the bogus order on computation issue. Gotta waste another new burner now to call back tomorrow. One and done, son. Check the crucial Pennlive.com report quote,
"In Philadelphia, Voigt said, the petitions were received prior to the computation of the votes."
Wrong.
So where can she appeal to next, Jander? What are her remains options in Michigan?
DeleteFederal court hearing on Friday for statewide count in PA.
DeleteThis judge that denied Stein defended Hillary, Obama? She's a Dem? That's pretty stunning. She actually did her job?
@Diogenes, she can go to Michigan Supreme Court, then US Supreme Ct arguing only Constitutional issue.
DeleteDiogenes,
DeleteShe can appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court. My gut tells me that they won't take the appeal which means the Michigan Appellate Court ruling stands. My feeling is that Michigan is done. We will see!
markm
At SCOTUS she cant argue state law issues. Only Constitutional issue is jurisdictional at scotus. She ought not bother. I will have commentary on judges order asap. Prob in the morning though.
DeleteThe libtards take this russian crap seriously. I mean like they are superpeople able to sway the grass roots america and come in like techo ninja turtles and hack our machines ... etc. I have to laugh we have know Hillary since she sold cattle futures in Arkansas and came up that magical 100,000 grand. Like we need Russian trolls to form our opinion. Thank god the judge did not give credence to the cyber hack concerns or it could have joined to a similar PA decision on Friday and Jillary could have claimed the whole election had been contaminated and Obama needed to stay Prez or some other similar craziness. All I know is all the numbers in all the states are a crazy mess. Just phony numbers they throw up there. For instance this guy thinks Trump actually has a huge gain in WI .. he could be right but then again the numbers can be weird. http://alexanderhiggins.com/wisconsin-recount-shows-potential-clinton-vote-fraud/
DeleteThere is something much more sinister behind the Russian narrative, Chatty. Yes, the lib sheeple swallow it, but it's better to focus on the Originators of this propaganda, and why they believe it fits with their larger strategy. There is evidence to suggest that not only are Obama and Hillary allies of Russia, but that Russia wishes to attack the US and needs to build a plausible case. But I will cross that bridge if we get closer.
DeleteI agree this Russian thing is sinister. And Russia is def knocking their camel nose under our tent. But on the libtard side and not ours. I don't believe or watch MSM ever. But we are in a precarious situation in the world right now. And the Lord has blessed us with someone who is not Hillary
DeleteThat's going to be really fucking retarded if Jill tries to take MI to the US Supreme Court once MI Supreme Court does the obvious thing and tells her off.
ReplyDeleteActually, if you remember, she " SKIPPED " the MI SC. The SCOTUS will not hear this in ANY way. I would almost take that to the bank. They didn't want to hear the 2000 BvG, much less, we have a case here where she hasn't even followed process at the State Level yet. Remember she jumped the Colonel to go to the Admiral in a sense by jumping the gun to the 6th. In fact, the 6th District ruling pretty much is also a death knell. I would consider this option DOA.
DeleteI suppose it really says something when a sergeant on our side (AG Bill Schuette) can take down their admiral (6th Circuit Fed court), doesn't it?
DeleteAnyway, it looks like our new upcoming headache is getting through the thick skulls of Floridian voters that only the FL Secretary of State can demand a recount.
DeleteI imagine the Supreme Court would be deadlocked 4-4. So it's all about the lower ruling.
ReplyDeleteRemember that none of this matters if they "find" just one instance of hacking or fraud. That would be enough for her to relitigate each state over again. It's not over until every single state is done.
ReplyDeleteI don't think that will happen . They're running out of one thing time ?December 12 is the date , where everything needs to be certify . And the 19 th is the day the electoral college vote . There is no way there going to find anything. Or have any recounts .
ReplyDeleteIn my heart of hearts - I think they are shutting MI down quietly, I think people were starting to find the proverbial bodies in Detroit!! WI is going to be ok I think!!
ReplyDeleteThey are watching us and others like us all across the net at NSA and doing algorythms on how interested we are in the Recounts and such to judge what the reaction would be if Fed Judges and Courts took the election away from Trump. I think that D wave quantum computer linked to Facebook, amazon et al and is an exact simulation of our tech online world has let them know that they are The Powers That Were. It is the Apolcalypse which means The Unveiling. All there manipulations and dark spells on the American minds are being broken.
DeleteIt can't be an option. Simply no way to sell it. Obama and his ilk would lose what they desperately need: legitimacy. If Trump is actually properly elected by the EC on December 19th , there's only one option left for them: unleash the "refugees". On an absolutely massive scale.
DeleteUnleashing refugees does nothing for Obama, especially since there's a limit to how many they can get here before Trump takes over. Trump will just send them all back. Not to mention it'd overtly tarnish Obama's legacy.
DeleteYou're not understanding. Unleash the ones already here. Huma would tell her friends in the MB to activate their sleepers. Barry needs a crisis to stay in power and that's their last card to play.
DeleteThis is clearly illegal >> http://www.wfmz.com/news/southeastern-pa/chester-county-oks-presidential-recount-in-most-precincts/201938214
ReplyDeleteI can see a loophole in the computation to allow it, but seems the petitions are not properly filed.. You can read for yourselves at http://www.dailylocal.com/general-news/20161208/presidential-recount-ordered-in-chester-county
ReplyDelete